What one review found.
Two offshore ETFs that cost NZ$525,000 put this client in the FIF rules: about NZ$36,500 of income next year on the fair dividend rate, taxed whatever the funds pay out, and NZ$13,479 of New Zealand tax at 39% after the US withholding credit.
Why: once the cost of a client’s FIF interests passes NZ$50,000, every one of them is in the rules, and the first NZ$50,000 is not exempt. The review classifies each holding (the New Zealand share is not a FIF, the ASX-listed company is exempt under s EX 31), credits the US tax withheld on the US-listed fund up to the New Zealand tax on it, and shows the tax lost inside the Irish fund as a cost. Beside the S&P 500 fund it sets the same index in a Smart listed PIE, taxed at 28%: about NZ$1,008 a year less in tax and fees for this client, a comparison to weigh, not a recommendation.
Decision support for professional review, not tax advice. Today’s value stands in for the 1 April opening value. The comparative value method, the quick sale adjustment, the choice of exchange-rate method and credits for non-US withholding are not modelled. A holding whose cost is not known stops the NZ$50,000 test; it is never guessed.