Portfolio Software for Financial Advisers in New Zealand: FIF, PIEs and KiwiSaver

New Zealand taxes offshore investments unlike its neighbours. Above NZ$50,000 of cost, a client's US ETFs, Irish funds and most Australian ETFs are taxed each year on deemed income under the foreign investment fund (FIF) rules rather than on what they pay out, while ASX-listed companies are exempt and a local PIE may cost less. A review has to know which side of each line the client sits on. This note is for financial advisers and small firms in New Zealand: the questions those reviews raise, what Borderfolio for Advisors screens, a worked example and where it stops. The figures are screening estimates for professional review, not tax advice.

Who it is for

Advisers and boutique firms in New Zealand whose clients hold offshore shares and ETFs, KiwiSaver alongside a personal portfolio, or assets from years in Australia, the UK or the US. Borderfolio is a review and cross-border intelligence layer beside the systems you already use. It is not a CRM, a KiwiSaver provider's platform or a trading system, and it never recommends.

The questions a New Zealand review raises

What Borderfolio screens for a New Zealand resident

New Zealand is one of the residences covered in depth; countries and coverage lists what that includes.

A worked example

Illustrative round figures, not a real client. A New Zealand resident, not transitional and with no FIF income returned in the last four years, holds:

HoldingCostClassification
US-domiciled S&P 500 ETFNZ$40,000FIF interest
ASX-listed bank sharesNZ$20,000Exempt (s EX 31)
ASX-listed Australian share ETF (unit trust)NZ$15,000FIF interest until s EX 32 is confirmed
NZX-listed sharesNZ$10,000Not a FIF interest

The answer turns on one fact the adviser confirms with the issuer. The screen does not guess it.

What it does not do

How it fits beside your existing systems

Borderfolio for Advisors is a cross-border intelligence layer, not a replacement for your CRM, platform, back office or planning software. Client data reaches it in two ways today. Brokerage statements are uploaded as PDF, CSV, XLSX or images: exports from 15 brokers are read by format-specific parsers, other statements go through an extraction model, and every import is reviewed before anything is confirmed (importing statements). Accounts at Interactive Brokers (Flex) and Freedom24 can instead be connected to the broker's read-only API; synced holdings land unconfirmed and go through the same review (connect a broker). Connections to adviser systems such as Intelliflo and NDEX are in development and are not live.

Statements from New Zealand brokers without a dedicated parser go through the extraction model and are reviewed before confirmation. Your CRM and planning software stay where they are; Borderfolio adds the FIF and cross-border review and a client-ready PDF built from a stored snapshot (reports).

Frequently asked questions

Is the NZ$50,000 FIF test on cost or value?

Cost: the total cost of the client's FIF interests at any time in the year. Above it, every interest is in the rules, including the first NZ$50,000.

Are Australian shares FIF interests?

ASX-listed Australian companies that keep a franking account are exempt under s EX 31. An Australian unit trust, which includes most ASX ETFs, is exempt only if it meets s EX 32; Borderfolio treats it as a FIF interest until you mark it.

Does Borderfolio compare offshore ETFs with PIEs?

For S&P 500 and total-world trackers it compares Smart listed PIEs at 28% and an unlisted PIE at the client's prescribed investor rate, as tax and fees a year. It is a comparison, not a recommendation.

Does it use the comparative value method?

No. The estimate uses the fair dividend rate. The comparative value method needs the whole year's flows and is not modelled.

Related articles